production run. Foam buildup can be counteracted mechanically through
devices attached to the stirrer´s shaft or by the addition of surfactants (an-
tifoam agents). The latter, however, can impact negatively the pO2 control as
well as subsequent clarification and DSP steps. For high cell density (HCD)
cultivations exceeding 4E07 cells/mL it might even be required to use two
spargers to provide appropriate aeration for cell growth. Using pure oxygen
instead of air again can help to reduce foaming as the flow rate can be
lowered. However, aeration with pure oxygen results in a CO2-free atmo-
sphere, thus, favoring pH increase. In contrast, if pH decreases too fast it
might be favorable to aerate with pure oxygen [54].
b. Surface aeration and non-contact systems
Bubble-free aeration systems aim to supply oxygen to shear sensitive cell
cultures. In surface aeration, oxygen transfers from the headspace to the
culture through the gas-liquid interface area in either OSB or STR, where
vessel geometry, agitation speed, and working volume influence its rate
[69]. In addition, O2 supply can be enhanced through immersed silicon
tubing aerators, owing to the relatively high O2 permeability in this ma-
terial. Unlike surface aeration, the transfer rate is independent of the
stirring speed due to the fact that the main mass transfer resistance relies
on the silicon tubing wall. By selection of an adequate length and wall
thickness of the silicon tubing as well as the volumetric flow rate and the
O2 content in the flow stream, these aerators can achieve oxygen transfer
rates similar to those of gas spargers [63].
c. Mixing
Short mixing times for dispersion of either gas or nutrients is especially
challenging at larger size of the bioreactor vessels. As this often cannot
be achieved by faster stirring, increase of turbulence and reduction of
stagnant zones is often obtained through vessel and impeller design [70].
In general, the use of radial flow impellers, such as the Rushton type,
results in a better dispersion of the gaseous phase at the expense of
increased power consumption and lower mixing efficiency [71]. The use
of two or more impellers increases mixing efficiency depending on their
spacing along the shaft [72,73]. When radial and axial flow impellers are
combined, lower power consumption and mixing times are obtained.
However, a configuration of three 6-blade Rushton impellers spaced with
a distance equal to the impeller diameter, can deliver the highest kLa per
delivered power unit [74]. The considerable progress and refinement
in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) offers options for an a priori
evaluation of the mixing system. For example, Gelves and coworkers
compared the performance of a typical Rushton impeller system against
novel pitched blade impellers with rotatory microspargers through CFD
mass transfer and hydrodynamic modeling. Experimental and computa-
tional results confirmed an increase a 34-fold increase in kLa with a 50%
saving in power in comparison to the conventional system used as a
reference [75].
Upstream processing for viral vaccines
109